Marla Ruzicka “youthful representative of a certain kind of not-yet-lost American idealism”

December 31st, was supposed to be Marla Ruzicka’s 30th birthday.
Marla has founded the Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC) and convinced Congress to create an Iraqi War Victims Fund
. Lawmakers
realized that financial compensation for families of civilians
accidentally injured or killed by the U.S. military is important for
helping them cope financially. A compassionate response might convince
the families that Americans feel sorry about their loss; therefore they
might not hate Americans, i.e.
Marla was advancing US interests. Newsweek‘s Baghdad bureau chief wrote
that “Marla was alienated from much of the human rights community
because she chose to work with the military instead of always against
it.”
As Peter Bergen wrote in the Washington Post:

Ruzicka
initially came off like a blond surfer girl (she was much given to
exclaiming “Dude!” and “You rock!”), but underneath the effervescent
exterior was a tough-minded humanitarian advocate who had little
tolerance for leftist anti-war demonstrators. Ruzicka understood that
wars happen despite the demonstrations, and she wanted to do something
concrete to alleviate the subsequent damage to human life.

Rolling Stone Magazine described her as a “youthful representative of a certain kind of not-yet-lost American idealism.” It’s a good, balanced and heart-wrenching biographic article.
 

Her friend Jennifer Abrahamson has just published the book Sweet Relief: The Marla Ruzicka Story (Amazon.com | Amazon.de).
Marla was killed in car bomb explosion in Bagdad in April 2005. CIVIC continues her work helping civilian victims in Iraq and Afghanistan. CIVIC’s executive director Sarah Holewinski wrote in USA Today recently: “NATO must follow US lead in helping Afghan civilians.”

Unfortunately,
the media does not write much about the many relief workers in war and
natural disaster zones around the world, while they are alive. The
nameless aid and relief workers around the world who risk their lives
to help others don’t get awards or much press coverage. Time Magazine
rather gives the Person of the Year award to folks like you and me, who spend a lot of time sitting comfortably in front of the computer. Exception: Doctors Without Borders (
Médecins
Sans Frontières) received the 1999 Nobel Peace Prize. “The
American soldier” deserved the Time’s award in 2003. The US military
provides a lot of humanitarian aid around the world, primarily after
natural disasters (like in Pakistan), but it is not their primary job.

Without the Iraq war, Marla Ruzicka would most likely be able to celebrate her 30th birthday today. And the nearly 3,000 US soldiers, who died in Iraq, would probably be alive as well. Estimates concerning Iraqi casualties range from a few ten thousand to close to a million.

Endnote: Associated Press interviewed scholars, veterans and other Americans about this poll:

Americans
may question this war for many reasons, but their doubts often find
voice in the count of U.S. war deaths. An overwhelming majority — 84
percent — worry that the war is causing too many casualties, according
to a September poll by the nonpartisan research group Public Agenda.
The country largely kept the faith during World War II, even as about
400,000 U.S. forces died — 20,000 just in the monthlong Battle of the
Bulge. Before turning against the wars in Korea and Vietnam, Americans
tolerated thousands more deaths than in Iraq.

One Comment

Leave a reply to Tom Cancel reply