“Guantanamo has brought shame to our nation”

Protests worldwide mark the 5-year anniversary of Guantanamo



By Carol Rosenberg and Lesley Clark

McClatchy Newspapers

(MCT)

From anti-Iraq war mom Cindy Sheehan in Cuba to protesters in a
Washington, D.C., courthouse, demonstrators fanned out across the globe
Thursday to protest America’s five-year-old experiment in offshore
incarceration at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The protests came as a top Democrat said Congress would scrutinize
the Bush administration’s handling of the Guantanamo prison camps with
an eye toward closing the facility.

“The new Democratic majority has every intention of conducting
vigorous oversight on these issues and getting answers on the
administration’s detention practices,” said House Majority Leader Steny
Hoyer, D-Md. “The administration has said it hopes to close the
facility at Guantanamo, an objective that I share.”

About 100 protesters were arrested in a Washington courthouse, and
U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon used his first news conference to
likewise call for closure of the remote U.S. prison in southeast Cuba.

“Gitmo prison is a source of shame. No more torture in our name,”
chanted protesters in Cuba-controlled Guantanamo, where Sheehan marched
with a dozen or so international protesters on the other side of a
minefield from the U.S. Navy base.

Amnesty International and other human rights groups choreographed
the daylong protests from Europe to Australia to the Americas on five
years to the day when the Pentagon opened the detention and
interrogation center for international captives airlifted from
Afghanistan.

The protests achieved their desired results.

News photographs of orange jumpsuit-clad protesters – on the march,
on their knees or in chains – splashed across the Internet from such
far-flung cities as Melbourne, Australia, Budapest, Hungary, and
Thessaloniki, Greece.

The Pentagon argues that the prison camps are a war-on-terror
necessity. About 395 men and teens are held there, some of whom could
soon face war-crimes trials, once the Defense Department unveils its
new design for military commissions.

At the U.S.-controlled corner of Guantanamo, the day passed
peacefully and without notice, although 14 captives were listed as
hunger strikers. Five were being fed through tubes in their noses under
military medical protocols for forced feedings.

A minefield and no-man’s land separated the chants of Sheehan and her fellow protesters from the 45-square-mile U.S. Navy base.

“It’s a normal work day here,” reported U.S. Army Col. Lora Tucker
by e-mail. It passed with “nothing special going on to mark the
anniversary,” she added. “We are just continuing our mission of safe,
humane care of the detainees.”

Not so in downtown Washington, not far from Congress, where about
100 demonstrators were arrested in a federal courthouse for waving
signs and wearing T-shirts that said “Stop Torture” and “Shut Down
Guantanamo.”

They were led away in plastic handcuffs.

Earlier, hundreds of foes of U.S. detention policy fanned out on the
steps of the Supreme Court, some in detainee-style jumpsuits and black
hoods, others in mock military garb, and staged some political theater
of their own in the frigid winter weather.

“Guantanamo has brought shame to our nation,” Larry Cox, executive
director of Amnesty International, told the crowd from a lectern
entwined with barbed wire.

Behind him stood dozens of protesters, some with black tape across
their mouths, others bearing the names of detainees. “There’s no
evidence that we have been made safer,” said Cox, “but there is growing
evidence that the moral authority of the United States has been
severely diminished.”



Rosenberg reported from Miami, Clark from Washington.

powered by performancing firefox

One Comment

  1. david

    if you are outraged by Pentagon lawyer Stimson’s comments, want the restoration of the writ of habeas corpus and think that Guantanamo is a disgrace to our justice system get involved at:

    projecthamad.org

    Join the project!

Leave a reply to david Cancel reply